| |
Press Release
|
New Functional Proteomics Market Holds Potential
for Huge Growth in Coming Years
June 2001, Redwood City, CA
Technical innovations that can dramatically reduce the time required
to develop new therapeutics are driving the emergence of a new research
field called functional proteomics, and companies engaging in this
research could see huge growth in coming years, according to a new
report from BioInsights of Redwood City, California. The functional
proteomics market involves a group of emerging companies that are
attempting to bypass traditional, time-consuming research techniques
that rely on serendipity, while also avoiding the deluge of data
from the first generation of high-throughput technologies.
These companies are attempting to accelerate the slow transitions
from discovery to validation to screening by using the same platforms
for target identification all the way through lead compound generation.
If successful, their sales could increase from an aggregate estimated
value of $40 million in 2000 to more than $550 million in 2006,
according to biotech strategist BioInsights.
The key reason for projecting compound annual growth of 55% over
the next five years is the level of technical innovation within
functional proteomics companies. New protein-protein interaction
platforms can be used to quickly map out protein pathways, as well
as to screen for compounds that inhibit those interactions. New
fractionation methods can be used to identify and analyze assemblies
of proteins that participate in pathways, as well as provide functional
screens to identify potential therapeutics. New expression technologies
allow the cells themselves to do the work of identifying and validating
key molecular mechanisms underlying specific disease phenotypes,
as well as provide cell-based screens for potential small molecule
inhibitors. This broad range of innovations greatly increases the
likelihood that the overall market will be highly successful.
In addition to performing a total market analysis, BioInsights segmented
the functional proteomics market based on technology. The technologies
were categorized by virtue of their physiological setting: in vivo,
for studies carried out in mammalian model systems; and ex vivo,
for those studies carried out either in vitro or in a foreign system.
These two categories have technological and market implications
for the companies employing them. In vivo companies are likely
to provide better data relevance, but are unlikely to drive the
market until after 2004 due to their youth.
|
|